—
—
![]() |
Original publication, dated September 25, 2022. |
The photo above is the original publication. Unfortunately, it has been deleted, so it is difficult to say now, what were address and number. But it makes sense to restore it, even under a different number (address) now, just for the memories. It is dated September 25, 2022. The publication was used as a response to a phone call, this is a conversation with an unidentified official from the prosecutor’s office of the Tula region in writing.
—
For a woman, who called from the number (+7 487 236-31-58)
We are talking, as far as I understand, about this appeal.
This message is consonant with the following. But it was sent on 31.08.22, so it does not appear in the following.
A small comment. I gave links to publications in LiveJournal, where the publication was written in Russian. This link is the same publication, but it is translated into English.
A small comment. I gave links to publications in LiveJournal, where the publication was written in Russian. This link is the same publication, but it is translated into English.
In short, in the middle of the month I wrote to everyone, for who I had enough imagination, about medical care. The point is here.
https://koroleva-o-a.livejournal.com/5302.html
If it is short here, then this is an accusation of three persons in committing a crime with the listed articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and the facts, on the basis of which the accusation is based. The members of the medical staff exceeded their official powers, personally deciding, that the circumstances of the injury are not criminal in nature (this is the prerogative of law enforcement agencies, not some medical staff), they «decided» it from the words of a suspect in the commission of a crime, and write a document from his words (this is a forgery, deliberately false information, witnesses do not exist), they lied about the domestic nature of the injury, thereby both hiding the crime and letting law enforcement agencies on the wrong track. Thus, the composition of the crime seems to be obvious. Only the collusion side is missing, they did it by prior agreement to hide the criminal, by hiding the fact of the crime itself, or they did it out of stupidity (he told them, they believed him). But even in this case, it is a pre-not-promised cover-up of the murder.
But that’s what I think. Law enforcement agencies think otherwise. The kids made a little joke, nothing more, than a disciplinary punishment, to threaten with a finger. Well, etc., which made me angry.
A month has passed, now it’s the end of September. Where is the initiation of a criminal proceedings under these articles? Or where is the refusal to initiate criminal proceedings? No proceedings, no refusal, that could be challenged. So yes, we can assume, that your intervention did not help, although the initiation of criminal proceedings is not your prerogative. But there is also no intervention by you as a supervisory authority. Do you, as the prosecutor’s office for the region, agree, that some medical staff have the right to decide, whether the injury is criminal or domestic? If you do not agree, then where is the criminal case under Article 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation? Where is the supervisory case against those, who have not initiated a criminal case under this article? Or was there an excess, but this is not Article 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation? Medical staff may exceed their authority, and we’ll threaten them with a finger? Do you know, that the country will then be overwhelmed by a wave of murders under the guise of domestic accidents? Which no one will even not know about, because the staff did not tell.
Similarly for forgery. Do you, as the prosecutor’s office for the region, agree, that medical staff have the right to fill out documents as God puts them on their soul? Write, that there was a domestic injury, because someone said so? Or is it not an official document? If you do not agree, then where is the criminal case under Article 292 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation? Where is the supervisory case against those, who have not initiated a criminal case under this article? Or are there half-measures here, it seems, that there is false information, but it do not pull on Article 292 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation? It is necessary to decide and publicly declare as the prosecutor’s office, that either — or. Or is it an official document, this is obviously false information, entered in an official document (no one not saw, that my sister fell down the stairs, then on what basis is it written, that my sister fell down the stairs), and this is not Article 292 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Or it’s not an official document, it’s not deliberately false information, but reliable, it was found out by Kuzmichev I.K., who is also not a criminal, but a conscientious official. Either—or. It will not be possible to get off with half measures, that this is a crime in general, but in this particular case, it is necessary to come into the situation. I won’t come in and not calm down.
Similarly, the concealment of the crime, but this is a hitch now. It is already the end of September, but we still cannot decide, whether there was a murder at all (Article 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Because Kuzmichev I.K. «stalled» it as an accident, if it is unwound, then can sent half of Novomoskovsk in prison.
Did the appeal to the regional prosecutor’s office help in this case? No, it didn’t help, I still haven’t received a sane answer at the yes or no level. Moreover, it did not help by August 31, only after.
And again. The medics came to the call, they have a man with a serious injury, they are met by a man, who claims, that she fell down the stairs, but he did not see it. They fill out a paper, that she fell down the stairs, although they didn’t see it either. No one goes to the police, because she fell down the stairs, although no one saw it. If this is not a cover-up of a crime, then what, in your opinion, as a supervisory authority, is a cover-up of a crime? Here your colleagues from Novomoskovsk went the way, that there was no crime.
Swollen Prosecutor’s Office of Russia — 1
A small comment. I gave links to publications in LiveJournal, where the publication was written in Russian. This link is the same publication, but it is translated into English.
Swollen Prosecutor’s Office of Russia — 2
A small comment. I gave links to publications in LiveJournal, where the publication was written in Russian. This link is the same publication, but it is translated into English.
We will leave Article 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Article 316 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. What about Article 286 of the Criminal Code and Article 292 of the Criminal Code? There was nothing? Fine, but where is the paper, signed by a specific official, who will sign it?
Thus, this appeal to the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation was written, because I did not receive an answer to my question (and I still have not received it). What should it look like? It should be a paper with a signature and a seal of approximately the following content. That your appeal has been reviewed, an inspection has been carried out, a criminal case has been initiated under such and such articles. Or that your appeal has been reviewed, an inspection has been carried out, a criminal case has been refused for such and such reasons. At the end of September, I haven’t seen anything like this yet.
—
Next publication..
Comments