—
—
![]() |
Original publication, dated September 23, 2022 (second part) |
The photo above is the original publication. Unfortunately, it was deleted, so now it is difficult to say, what were her address and number. But it makes sense to restore it, even now under a different number (address), just for the memory. It is dated September 23, 2022.
—
Bubenina L.F. did not stop there.
![]() |
There are no basis for revoking the decision to refuse to initiate criminal proceedings — this is public and for posterity. |
There is no need to cancel the resolution, there was no crime in the actions of Kuzmichev I.K., everything is legal. Everything is legal — it’s about falsification (Article 303 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), concealment of a crime (Article 316 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and forgery (Article 292 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), the signs of which are visible in every page. Bubenina L.F., an employee of the prosecutor’s office of Russia, publicly and at all times stated, that investigators of the Investigative Committee can falsify, conceal and commit forgery, for them it is not considered a criminal offense. A public statement from the acting deputy city prosecutor, a lawyer of the 2nd class.
But that’s not all. It is established, that the conclusions of the preliminary investigation body are justified and correspond to the actual circumstances of the incident.
First, let’s take a closer look, how are these conclusions justified in general? We need to start with the fact, that Fotteler E.V., according to him, was sitting near the fire and did not see anything. Therefore, he cannot be considered a witness and is not. But investigator Kuzmichev I.K. asks him to show, what he did not see. And he shows.
![]() |
Fotteler E.V. shows his fantasies on the theme with a doll. |
It is these fantasies, that will become the actual circumstances of what happened. Do they match? Reasonably?
The conclusions of the preliminary investigation body are initially false, because they are based on the fantasies of a person, who stated in the testimony, that he did not see anything. If he showed, that he saw it with his own eyes, that would be completely different. But he just heard something (a bag of potatoes fell). And it’s clear why. Show him this, and he can be exposed on a lie, because.
![]() |
Even from the third stage, a partition will interfere with falling to the side. |
Need to explain, why the accessories on the boards and the boards themselves are not touched? From any step, the fall will be on the boards, the partition on the right will prevent you from falling to the side (if you stand facing the boards on the steps, then on the left). With any, except the first and second. Only from them you can fall to the side, the partition will not interfere. So Kuzmichev I.K. will have exactly the second stage, others would force him to bring charges of murder, it would not be possible to shield the criminal.
![]() |
The Koroleva O.A. descends from the second floor and falls. |
It is necessary to explain why a person goes down the stairs, falls face forward, and hits the back of his head. Although don’t have to try, because it’s a lie. From the second stage, even from a standing position, it is physically impossible, the distance is too small to turn 180 degrees. When moving, when a person has already gained inertia, this is even more impossible. And the second stage will not work there, so Kuzmichev I.K. just missed this moment. Well, that’s how it is. And even to the side.
It is necessary to explain, why one side of the jacket-vest is clean, and the other is dirty. If lie on the floor, both sides will be dirty. If not lying down, or if the traces are erased, then on both sides. No, can arrange a clowning, as the new deputy Serdyuk D.N. wanted, apply a cloth to the floor surface, traces will remain or not. But it is not necessary to explain this, but why they are in places, and in places not. Because falling to the floor is a lie, but that doesn’t rule out falling at all. It’s just not on the floor, not from the stairs, nor with back. Kuzmichev I.K., in order to conceal the crime, will exclude the jacket-vest not because of this, but because there are signs of murder on the hood. He was not going to expose the fantasies of Fotteler E.V. on lies, because they are fantasies, and because he was a co-author. It turns out, that the acting deputy city prosecutor, a lawyer of the 2nd class Bubenina L.F. sees the validity exactly this way, everything is validly and not contradictory.
![]() |
Kuzmichev’s I.K. nightmare |
![]() |
Which let Chausov R.N. deal with. |
Need to explain, where the bruise on right hand came from. Even if it was formed it is unclear when, need to explain and prove, that it was not then. Now, if Yulkova S.V. had say in testimony, that she had seen the bruise in the evening, that would be one thing. And when there are nothing in testimony, it’s another thing. Then need to get out of it so, that the Fotteler E.V. is not charged with murder. From the point of view of Bubenina L.F., Kuzmichev I.K. got out reliably and not contradictory. So much, so that it is not even necessary to justify, why Kuzmichev I.K. decided, that the bruise did form not on the evening of June 5.
It turns out fantasies, lies in fantasies, and not the conclusions of the preliminary investigation body, that are justified and appropriate to the actual circumstances. That’s where L.F. Bubenina would ask herself, why these lies and fantasies are needed? But she chose to lie in an official document herself (but this is not a forgery (Article 292 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), as one might think about a lawyer of the 2nd class), everything is reliable and reasonable.
If everything is so reliable, then why do need this?
![]() |
The jacket-vest is being considered by the Investigative Committee for the second time. It’s been ten days, by the way. |
The Investigative Committee grudgingly agrees, that the circumstances have not been clarified. Or to calm me down. But Bubenina L.F. publicly and in descendants stated, that she had no doubts, everything was found out reliably, reasonably and in accordance, there were no reasons to cancel the decision to refuse to initiate criminal proceedings on June 13. All this is public, signed and sealed, with free access to materials, where everyone can draw their own conclusions.
Comments