—
—
—
09.19.12 I applied to the Novomoskovsk Prosecutor’s office with the following statement.
![]() |
This is a copy of the application to the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Novomoskovsk, which I attached as a continuation of the appeal. |
A whole week has passed, but not a word from the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs about the decision. The CPC hints, that the decision should be made in three days. If it is not enough, then it is extended, about which the applicant must be notified. But this is not about Novomoskovsk, where they put on such conventions. And to find out about the decision, need to write somewhere again, it doesn’t work any other way. In addition to prolongation, it may be rejection or excitation (but not from psychology).
Actually, both Moscow and Tula have already read about Kuzmichev’s «art» (crime), and in the Criminal Procedure Code there is a note, that information about the crime is already sufficient to initiate or verify. But no excitation, no check. From which we can conclude, that either the CPC does not work, or there are no «arts» (crime), everything is fine. One of two things.
The prosecutor’s office adheres to the second version.
Bubenina L.F. publicly (and for the sake of history) stated, that parallel investigation is not practiced in Russia. Murder is a monopoly of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. Something, that is quite in the practice of many even developing countries. Quite so.
Actually, I did not complain about the actions of the investigator, I plan to do this tomorrow in the form of a full-fledged statement to the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Novomoskovsk. But let’s say. Bubenina L.F. publicly and for posterity stated, that..
![]() |
Just attached a ruler. Criminalistics expertise? God forbid, examined it and didn’t find anything interesting for the investigation, because it’s already July 13. |
This clowning is not falsification (Article 303 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), not concealment of the fact of a crime (Article 316 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), not forgery (Article 292 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), although I personally measured something completely different (the result), there is in the net. But no, just the investigator attached a ruler on the day of the decision to refuse to initiate a criminal case. Because if attach it another way, so can come to the murder charge.
![]() |
The bruise makes it difficult to shield the criminal. Incriminates. |
This is also not falsification (Article 303 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), not concealment of the fact of a crime (Article 316 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), not forgery (Article 292 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). About what the acting deputy city prosecutor, a lawyer of the 2nd class Bubenina L.F. declares publicly and to the memory of descendants. Well, Kuzmichev I.K. decided, that at another time and in another place. On what basis did decide and how did found out it? He did not establish it, that’s why he turned to the department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Novomoskovsk, because he himself does not know who, where and when. But he knows for sure, that it is not Fotteler E.V., not on June 5 and not on the garden place.
This is not falsification (Article 303 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), not concealment of the fact of a crime (Article 316 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and not forgery (Article 292 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). But to make a request to find out, if part of the correspondence has been deleted — God forbid. Never know, what will float up. To find out the contents of the information in the sent file either don’t need. There were cats there, pink. By the way, the same blizzard was carried by the new deputy Serdyuk D.N., that if delete a message from WhatsApp, it will be visible. Until I personally deleted the message with him, after which there was no trace of message. But at least he had the sense not to carry such a thing in writing, and I did not keep a record. And Bubenina L.F. in writing.
![]() |
On June 6, two calls were made from the phone by Koroleva O.A., although she was already in intensive care at that time. |
If you have both phones (sender and recipient), then can delete everything compromising without a trace. And yes, Kuzmichev I.K. was not interested in the call at 21.53, a few minutes after calling a taxi.
![]() |
This is Belyaeva O.Y., another one became famous in the descendants. |
This is not falsification (Article 303 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), not concealment of the fact of a crime (Article 316 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and not forgery (Article 292 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). It just so happened, that her testimony word for word repeats the testimony of Marochkin V.V. So happened.
There’s a lot more. Can find it here.
Bubenina L.F. read the materials of the pre-investigation check, from where the smell of criminality comes from every page. Must to, because there is a link in the appeal. So, the options «I didn’t know, didn’t see and didn’t read» disappear. The answer and refusal is a conscious action after reading. Everyone can get acquainted with them and compare the contents with, what an employee of the Novomoskovsk prosecutor’s office writes. And draw conclusions. Bubenina L.F. doesn’t care, she said everything publicly and for posterity. That the criminality, that everyone can get acquainted with — it’s the normal actions of the investigator of the Investigation Committee of the Russian Federation, a role model. Publicly, for the whole country, for all times, with a signature and seal.
That’s not all.
—
Next publication..
Comments